As the shipping industry moves toward a multi-fuel future, decarbonised fuels are expected to be used in combination, says Mitsui OSK Lines, Ltd (MOL) president and chief executive Takeshi Hashimoto
He notes there is growing momentum globally for developing the necessary bunkering infrastructure to support this transition.
MOL is aligning its strategy accordingly, identifying LNG, methanol and biodiesel as short-term alternatives, while positioning ammonia and hydrogen as long-term solutions to achieve net-zero greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2050.
In an interview with Riviera, Mr Hashimoto welcomed the newly approved net-zero regulatory framework within IMO, calling it a positive step that will support the “transition of international shipping in the long-term.”
He added next-generation ships will require skilled seafarers, advanced vessel management practices, and a greater reliance on AI and digital technologies to optimise operations.
Our discussion also covered current geopolitical developments affecting maritime trade, including tariffs and proposed US port fees on Chinese-built tonnage. Mr Hashimoto cautioned such measures could prompt a restructuring of global supply chains. On the shipbuilding front, he expressed scepticism about the feasibility of excluding China in the long-term, given it has the world’s largest shipbuilding capacity.
Looking ahead, MOL will prioritise investments in energy-related shipping segments while also expecting rising demand for specialised dry bulk carriers, particularly open-hatch vessels.
MOL has been a pioneer in decarbonisation, targeting net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. With the industry moving toward a multi-fuel mix, how do you see this transition impacting shipping operations?
The selection and procurement of appropriate alternative fuels could significantly impact shipping operations and profitability. In the short term, supply centres for these fuels are expected to be somewhat consolidated, which may constrain shipping routes and affect tonne-miles. MOL anticipates these changes will create opportunities for supply chain development and new shipping demand.
Since the optimal choice of alternative fuel depends on various factors – such as the type and size of vessels and their shipping routes – dedicated bunkering hubs may be developed for each fuel type. Generally, some alternative fuels, including LNG and ammonia, are more challenging to handle than conventional fuels.
To ensure safe operations, which is the primary concern, it will become increasingly important to train and retain skilled seafarers and to advance shipmanagement expertise, regardless of the cargo or vessel type. As multiple alternative fuels will need to be used depending on the circumstances, operational complexity will inevitably increase. This, in turn, will amplify the need for AI and other advanced technologies to optimise vessel operations and enhance safety.
Do you see increasing momentum for alternative-fuel bunkering hubs worldwide?
Yes, we do. The expansion of bunkering hubs for LNG and biofuels is already underway globally, and methanol bunkering is now available at major container ports.
Ammonia bunkering infrastructure is in development – Singapore, in particular, is making progress and is expected to be ready within a few years.
MOL will consider investments and operational involvement in the development of these alternative-fuel bunkering hubs, depending on future needs.
Following IMO’s MEPC discussions, the industry now faces a new net-zero framework. Do you see this as a pivotal mechanism for emissions reduction?
We are pleased the framework for mid-term measures to reduce GHG emissions was agreed at the recent MEPC, thanks to the negotiation efforts of numerous national delegations. While we recognise some voices argue the measures are insufficient to meet IMO’s interim targets, we believe the agreed framework is expected to ensure the transition of international shipping in the long-term. As a company that has proactively pursued decarbonisation, we view this outcome positively.
We expect decarbonised marine fuels – such as e-methane, ammonia and methanol – to be used in combination, depending on a vessel’s type, size, and trading route. To support sustainable decarbonisation across the shipping industry, MOL has rapidly introduced various clean-energy solutions, including LNG as a transitional fuel, while also exploring new technologies and advocating for their adoption where appropriate.
We consider the agreed framework a significant step forward – not only in advancing our own decarbonisation strategy, but also in enabling the wider industry to implement sustainable, long-term emissions reductions. For it to function effectively as a mechanism to reduce emissions, continued collaboration is essential in shaping the system’s finer details and ensuring it delivers operational results within the IMO framework. MOL remains committed to actively contributing to these discussions.
Trade tensions – particularly US tariffs – are making headlines. Do you foresee an escalation, and what might be the implications for global shipping?
Thus far, it is reassuring to observe that discussions between the United States and other countries appear to be proceeding in a rational manner. Given the grace period prior to the implementation of tariffs, we are closely monitoring how the situation unfolds across various jurisdictions.
Should tariffs and retaliatory measures result in heightened global inflation and a slowdown in economic activity, maritime transport demand is likely to be affected. If trade tensions escalate with specific countries, there is a possibility that supply chains – including cargo flows – will be reorganised.
In a rapidly evolving landscape, those who respond swiftly will be best positioned to adapt. We continue to keep a close eye on the situation.
One proposal causing concern is the US port fees on Chinese-built vessels. How might this affect the wider industry?
Following the public hearing in March, the US Trade Representative announced these measures in April, but they come with a 180-day grace period before implementation in October.
There is significant opposition to the plan, so it may not proceed in its current form. Even if it does, most shipping companies are likely to mitigate the short-term impact through vessel reallocation. However, in the longer term, excluding China from shipbuilding would be quite difficult, as it represents the largest shipbuilding capacity globally.
You recently stated MOL will focus future investments on energy-related shipping. Could you share some examples of specific investments currently being explored?
The MOL Group will continue to prioritise energy-related investments, particularly in LNG, ethane and LPG carriers, as well as LNG-related floating infrastructure.
In the LNG and ethane sectors, our goal is to expand our fleet to approximately 150 vessels by 2030 to meet growing global demand. For LNG carriers, we aim to maintain our commitment to safe and stable operations, both domestically and internationally, by leveraging our extensive operational expertise. In the case of ethane carriers, we foresee increasing demand from emerging markets and plan to strengthen our firm position in the industry through fleet expansion.
In the LNG infrastructure segment, we are enhancing our investment portfolio, with a particular focus on floating storage and regasification units (FSRUs), LNG-fuelled ships, and floating LNG production facilities (FLNGs). As part of this commitment, we entered a strategic investment agreement with Delfin Midstream in June 2023, a company engaged in the development and operation of FLNG projects. We plan to complete the investment moving forward.
To reinforce our position in chemical logistics, MOL has also agreed to acquire 100% of LBC Tank Terminals, a major tank terminal operator with key facilities across Europe and the United States. The acquisition is expected to be completed in June.
Following your acquisition of Gearbulk, MOL now operates the world’s largest dry bulk fleet. What are the Group’s key objectives for renewing its dry bulk fleet? In your opinion, is the dry bulk sector moving swiftly enough toward fleet modernisation and sustainability?
First and foremost, our dry bulk business management policy prioritises segments that offer higher added value and require greater specialisation and uniqueness.
Within the dry bulk sector, we anticipate growing demand for open-hatch vessels, which efficiently transport high-value parcel cargo through consolidation. This trend is driven by evolving industrial and trade structures. By leveraging the combined strengths of MOL and Gearbulk – as well as G2 Ocean, a leading global operator in which Gearbulk holds a 65% stake – and their worldwide marketing networks, we believe we can enhance our cargo collection capabilities.
Regarding modernisation, although the dry bulk sector – particularly smaller vessels – faces challenges in moving quickly towards rapid emissions reduction, MOL remains fully committed to meeting our reduction targets through a range of strategies. These include vessel renewal, installation of wind-assisted propulsion systems and transitioning to alternative fuels.
Sign up for Riviera’s series of technical and operational webinars and conferences:
Events
© 2026 Riviera Maritime Media Ltd.