Propulsion technology researchers look to reduce underwater radiated noise harmful to marine life by adapting existing solutions ahead of mandatory regulations
IMO’s Sub-Committee on Ship Design and Construction agreed at the end of January to draft revised guidelines for the abatement of underwater radiated noise (URN), with the goal of reducing the impact of commercial shipping on marine life. The revised guidelines aim to make new recommendations based on the latest developments in ship design and technology and to address any barriers that could prevent the wider uptake of noise reduction measures. Those draft guidelines — a revision of those first issued in 2014 — will be taken up by the Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC 80), which meets 3-7 July 2023.
Water-lubricated bearings
Initial findings from research carried out by Thordon Bearings indicate a seawater-lubricated propeller shaft could have an important role to play in reducing propeller noise, given it is significantly quieter than one lubricated by oil.
While comparative studies have yet to be completed, the Canadian polymer bearings specialist says the low URN of a ship operating seawater-lubricated propeller shaft bearings is, more than any other aspect, the primary reason why the arrangement is favoured by naval forces and the fisheries sector.
“For fishing vessels, we are told: ‘seawater-lubricated propeller shafts don’t scare the fish away’ and for naval ships, a low signature means they can avoid a submarine’s passive sonar system,” says Thordon Bearings technical director Tony Hamilton. He notes more sectors – cruise, expedition, and research ships – adopting seawater-lubricated arrangements for noise abatement reasons alone.
Mr Hamilton says noise emissions should be considered as serious as marine exhaust gas emissions or any other source of ship-to-air and ship-to-sea pollution; but there is currently no legislation in place to prevent or reduce this source of environmental damage.
“The propeller is responsible for about 85% of a ship’s URN”
“Research shows the increase in ships and ship traffic globally is resulting in a steady rise in ambient noise across the frequency spectrum but current guidelines on URN are simply that: guidelines. More meaningful mandatory measures are required if the wider commercial maritime industry is serious about having a zero environmental impact or achieving UN Sustainable Development Goal #14, protecting life below water,” he says.
Typically, a rotating propeller and the vortex cavitation phenomena it creates can generate more than 180 dB of underwater radiated noise – a din louder than a jet engine – and can be heard by marine fauna up to a hundred miles away.
Indeed, research carried out last year by the University of Victoria, one of Canada’s leading research academies, found that the noise from increased ship traffic in the Arctic is resulting in “ship-avoidance reactions by beluga whales at extremely far distances – much farther than the whales could be seen from a ship.”
The propeller is responsible for about 85% of a ship’s URN, with anything above 155 db an existential threat to marine life, including whales, seals, porpoises, and dolphins, as it severely impairs their ability to navigate, communicate, source food, find a mate, avoid danger, and survive. Anthropogenic ocean noise negatively affects ecosystems, impacts biodiversity, and can alter the aquatic food chain.
“Unlike ships operating a metal bearing, an elastomeric polymer bearing is a noise dampener,” says naval architect Jeff Butt, Thordon’s business development manager, Navy and Coast Guard. “There is a significant amount of empirical data and testimony indicating its noise abatement capability.”
While it is logical that a seawater-lubricated polymer bearing is less noisy than the metal variety, the Thordon material is also reportedly quieter than rubber bearings and staves.
Thordon chief research engineer Gary Ren says a common problem with conventional rubber bearings is the squeaking and squealing that can occur when trawling at low speeds.
“This high-pitched noise will reverberate for miles under water. But the friction associated with conventional bearings is removed with our system, meaning shafts turn more easily. Noise is absorbed by the bearing in the 20 to 200 rpm range,” he says.
Degasifying the water
Propeller noise and cavitation on a seawater-lubricated propeller shaft could potentially be reduced even further by “degasifying” the water around the screw, by injecting water filtered through a 5µm membrane around the propeller blades.
According to the authors of the paper Prevention of Cavitation in Propellers, published in 2020 by Firenze University Press, “this boundary layer at least partially increases the negative pressure required to initiate cavitation at the surface, reducing the occurrence of cavitation during the relative movement.”
During trials on a test rig in Australia, measurements pointed to 10 db noise reduction after releasing the degassed water behind the propeller.
There is also the Prairie Air System, which some navies have been using to reduce propeller cavitation and, to a lesser extent, hull noise, for years. This method involves channelling air along the leading edge of the blade.
“The increase in ships and ship traffic globally is resulting in a steady rise in ambient noise”
Similar systems are being developed for commercial ships. And in 2019, for instance, Kongsberg Maritime announced it had adapted its Blade Air Emission system for commercial use. The company said the system, applicable to conventional fixed pitched and controllable pitched propellers, “minimises substantially underwater radiated noise” and is “a real game-changer” in propeller design.
Similarly, the PressurePores concept unveiled this year by the University of Strathclyde and a UK-based start-up reduces propeller tip vortex cavitation by applying a small number of strategically placed holes in the propeller blades.
Meanwhile, researchers at the University of British Columbia, Canada, are studying how fluid injections could help control propeller movement and if the introduction of wavy, serrated blade edges can ‘break up’ the water flow patterns that result in cavitation noise.
Dr Rajeev Jaiman, an associate professor at the University’s Department of Mechanical Engineering, and his team are also developing an AI-based solution capable of analysing the fluid interactions and dynamics behind the noise. The intention is to develop software to aid the design and manufacture of quieter propellers.
The researchers are working closely with Seaspan Shipyards, Robert Allan Limited, and Vard Marine in the five-year project that has funding support from Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).
Dr Jasmin Jelovica, co-lead on the project, says advanced materials could be better noise barriers: “They can be stronger and have other benefits as well. The good news for us, as researchers, is that the marine industry is receptive to these innovations. It recognises the need to change and to become more sustainable and environmentally friendly.”
© 2023 Riviera Maritime Media Ltd.