Lack of available feedstock and high demand across transport sectors present challenges for biofuel use in shipping, according to a report from class society Lloyd’s Register (LR)
In a new LR report, biofuels are discussed as a path to compliance with environmental regulations for ships that cannot make economically feasible retrofits to accommodate other fuels.
As part of a group of fuels that can be ’dropped in’ to burn in internal combustion engines in place of conventional fossil fuels, biofuels are generally compatible with existing onboard machinery and fuel tanks, and use the same bunkering infrastructure as fossil equivalents. An additional practical consideration that makes the fuels attractive is their similarity to traditional bunkers, which means there are fewer training requirements for crew on board the vessels burning the fuels than there would be for other lower- and zero-carbon fuels.
According to Lloyd’s Register, these similarities between biofuels and their fossil equivalents, as well as the ability to blend biofuels with traditional fuels, makes adopting biofuels a comparatively straightforward process for shipowners.
“As drop-in replacements for traditional fuels, biofuels require minimal changes to machinery and operations and offer greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions savings of up to 84% compared with traditional fuels,” the report Fuel for Thought: Biofuel says.
The main challenges for biofuel’s widespread deployment, according to LR, are availability and demand competition from other transport sectors, including aviation, and the investment in biofuel production capacity that will be needed to meet the growing demand from the transport markets.
The many types of biofuels produced through different processes can use a wide range of feedstocks. The diversity of sources can affect the GHG intensity of a fuel and can result in differing operational considerations for machinery. According to the LR report, the most established products suitable for shipping are fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) and hydrotreated vegetable oil (HVO), but there are cost considerations at play, with even the most suitable biofuels costing a premium in comparison with ’conventional’ fossil fuels.
LNG, blending and EU-based cost considerations
In its own recent report, Oslo, Norway-based research firm Rystad Energy cautioned shipowners operating vessels in the EU that, if they decide to use and can access biofuels, they must take into account the total lifecycle emissions of biofuels and "select the optimal blend to strike a balance between the emissions target and fuel costs".
For ships with LNG dual-fuel engines, Rystad Energy head of clean tech research, Artem Abramov, does see a role for HVO but thinks “LNG blending will remain the dominant decarbonisation tool until at least the mid-2030s due to its economic attractiveness.” LNG will retain a price advantage in the EU up until 2040 when it will fail to comply, requiring a ramp-up of biomethane blending.
The energy analyst says “the substantial price premium associated with biofuels, coupled with allowances under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), underscores the importance for shipowners of carefully considering both emissions levels and fuel quality when selecting biofuels for use in the EU.” It says under certain scenarios, “when the blended percentage is insufficient or the emissions reduction rate of the biofuel is inadequate, it may prove more advantageous for owners to use cheaper conventional fuel oil and pay associated penalties.”
Based on recent ordering, LNG is proving popular as a fuel and technology choice, with biofuel-based systems making up well under 1% of the shipbuilding contracts signed in H1 2024. Some 35.7% of tonnage on order or under construction at shipyards – just over 900 vessels – will be capable of using LNG, making it the clear fuel of choice for owners. With 242 newbuilds, methanol represents 9.0% of the orderbook, followed by LPG (111 newbuilds, 2.0%) and about 2.9% for other alternative fuels (419 vessels), including hydrogen (29), ethane (45), ammonia (26), biofuels (24) and battery/hybrid propulsion (about 395).
Biofuel’s economic challenges and the lack of biofuel-specific systems on order does not make the fuel itslef any less popular, according to Lloyd’s Register principal specialist, fuels lubes and emissions, Tim Wilson.
“Biofuels are unique among the future fuels for shipping as the vast majority of the world fleet is equipped with engines that can use them. As a drop-in replacement for fossil fuels, biofuels are an available and affordable method of reducing carbon emissions in the short term without large capital investment. The range of biofuel trials across ship segments and biofuel types reflect a strong level of interest from shipowners in their use on board.”
Rystad Energy research shows some 60 shipowners have conducted pilot projects in recent years using blends of FAME, referred to as biodiesel, or HVO, known as renewable diesel.
Riviera’s Maritime Decarbonisation Conference, Europe 2024 will be held in Amsterdam, 24 September 2024. Click here for more information on this industry-leading event.
Events
© 2026 Riviera Maritime Media Ltd.