Steel wire has fallen from favour in LNG mooring; synthetic ropes dominate but only if fibre quality meets modern safety and performance expectations
The use of steel wire in LNG mooring operations is steadily being phased out, supplanted by synthetic solutions built around high-modulus polyethylene (HMPE). But as vessel sizes grow and operational scrutiny tightens, it is becoming increasingly clear that not all HMPE fibres offer the same performance or reliability.
According to senior application development and technical sales manager for Dyneema, Bill Fronzaglia, the rationale for abandoning steel wire is no longer in question. “The LNG industry has moved on from steel wire and is increasingly embracing HMPE fibre systems,” he said. The reasons, he explained, stem from practical safety and performance factors that affect both the vessel and crew.
“Steel wire is not only obsolete, but a liability,” he noted. “There is no danger of broken wires causing hand injuries [with HMPE], and the much lighter weight reduces the risk of back injuries and lowers the potential recoil of snapback.”
“Steel wire is not only obsolete, but a liability”
This weight differential is considerable. HMPE ropes can be up to eight times lighter than steel of the same strength, and this translates into easier handling, reduced physical strain, and less time during mooring operations. The reduced danger to crew is matched by reduced impact on vessel equipment. Steel-on-steel contact can gouge hardware and create sparks — unsuitable around flammable cargo. The abrasive nature of wire also accelerates wear on mooring hardware, increasing maintenance needs.
As Mr Fronzaglia observed: “These risks are eliminated when vessels are fitted with HMPE-based mooring systems.”
Although steel wire rope is sometimes still purchased due to its lower initial cost, this approach may not factor in its overall lifecycle expense. Mr Fronzaglia said: “HMPE ropes have been shown to have a lower total cost of ownership over their lifetime.”
This is achieved not just through the rope’s extended service life, but through reduced maintenance requirements. Unlike steel, synthetic fibre does not require lubrication and causes less wear to associated deck equipment. Properly specified HMPE ropes can also remain in service for up to three times longer than steel alternatives, depending on environmental exposure and operating profile.
However, Mr Fronzaglia emphasised that not all HMPE ropes offer the same longevity. “As long as they are made from the right type of fibre, designed in the optimal way, and installed and maintained properly, they can outperform steel,” he said.
Performance disparities
Despite broad industry adoption of HMPE, the rapid expansion of this market has brought with it concerns about quality. The most prominent of these relates to generic, low-cost HMPE variants which offer reduced performance in critical areas such as abrasion resistance, fatigue life, and load-bearing consistency.
Framing this in practical terms, Mr Fronzaglia pointed out that “when vessel operators opt for a low-cost, generic fibre, they compromise the reliability of their mooring system — and the safety and efficiency of their operations.”
Some operators assume compliance with the OCIMF’s Mooring Equipment Guidelines (MEG4) is sufficient assurance of quality, but this is not necessarily the case. MEG4 requires that the rope be tested according to a prescribed methodology and verified by a third party, but it does not set pass/fail benchmarks for performance or durability.
“It does not include pass/fail criteria for fibre ropes,” Mr Fronzaglia confirmed. “MEG4 is only a minimum performance requirement and compliance means that the rope was tested and the numbers verified.”
In the absence of stricter oversight, the onus falls on shipowners, operators, and procurement officers to examine supplier documentation carefully.
One of the chief risks with lower-quality HMPE ropes is fatigue, which is impossible to detect during standard visual inspection. Over time, repeated cycles of tension and elevated temperature cause fibre degradation that may not present outward signs but can compromise the rope’s structural integrity.

“Unlike external damage, internal rope fatigue cannot be identified in a visual inspection,” Mr Fronzaglia noted. “That is why the choice of fibre ingredient is paramount.”
Even when high-grade fibre is used, the performance of the final rope product also depends on its construction. Some cost-cutting designs use less fibre and longer braid angles, which can meet Line Design Break Force (LDBF) requirements but compromise other vital attributes such as fatigue resistance and abrasion performance.
Operators also need to consider the service model offered by rope suppliers. Maintenance, inspection, and documentation support throughout the service life of the rope are essential to ensure that potential issues are caught early and addressed.
External pressures
The decline of steel is being accelerated by external pressures. The Panama Canal Authority, for instance, no longer permits wire ropes for new LNG passages. Elsewhere, some operators have embedded HMPE specifications into their fleet requirements.
Such decisions create a cascading effect: terminals and charterers increasingly expect vessels to arrive with compliant mooring configurations, and insurers may follow with new risk parameters.
With industry alignment forming around HMPE, steel is fast losing not only its economic logic but also its regulatory viability.
For LNG vessels operating at high ambient temperatures and often in exposed terminal environments, rope failure is not a hypothetical risk. The legacy of mooring line failures remains a stark reminder of what can happen when materials are poorly chosen or managed.
“Operators realise they need to prioritise long-term reliability,” said Mr Fronzaglia. “And that starts with the fibre inside the rope.”
Events
© 2026 Riviera Maritime Media Ltd.