Downturn in core markets, including offshore wind, left Argeo without work for its vessels and AUVs
An announcement by Norwegian survey company Argeo that it planned to file for bankruptcy has come as a shock to the market. The company delivered geophysical, geotechnical and geological services, having been established in late 2016. It provided lifecycle services to the offshore oil and gas; renewables; and marine minerals markets using robotics and digital solutions and had quickly gained a reputation for innovation.
The company, which went public in 2021, first indicated it planned to file for bankruptcy on 4 July 2025. Not long before that, in February 2025, it had completed a Nkr150M (US$15M) private placement, only to secure less work and revenue than expected, resulting in it using up its cash reserves and requiring additional funding – which it ultimately failed to obtain.
Trouble had been brewing at the company for several months as a letter to shareholders in the company’s first quarter 2025 report explained. Board chair Jan Grimnes said although the year began with a healthy level of operational activity, Argeo quickly faced significant political headwinds in all three of its primary markets, offshore wind, oil and gas and marine minerals. In a presentation about the Q1 period, Argeo said it had a firm backlog of US$14M but expected that to be consumed during Q2. It said it had a total “expected backlog” of US$164M, including firm and “additional expected contracts currently in negotiation.”
The cautious but upbeat presentation said Argeo was “entering a new phase of growth and innovation.” It noted that until then, its focus had been on identifying and commercialising solutions – which included autonomous underwater vehicles, deployment systems, vessels and geotechnical services. It had also expanded its capabilities, integrating autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs) with remotely operated vehicles (ROVs). “Looking ahead,” said the presentation, “our goal is to become the most efficient provider of seabed information.”
Sadly, that goal could not be realised as attempts to secure equity or debt financing, dispose of assets and seek other financial help failed and the decision to file for bankruptcy was announced, only for Argeo’s board to briefly suspend that process when it received “indication of interest from a significant industrial player” and “interest from multiple parties.” The parties in question reportedly “expressed interest in conducting transactions with Argeo and/or all or substantial parts of its subsidiaries.”
However, this brief period of optimism was short-lived, and in late July Argeo admitted “various processes” had not resulted in concrete offers that would secure sufficient funding. The board therefore resolved to proceed with filing for bankruptcy for Argeo ASA and its subsidiaries Argeo Survey AS, Argeo Robotics AS and Argeo Multiclient AS. Then, in a 25 July 2025 statement, the company confirmed that Asker and Bærum District Court had initiated bankruptcy proceedings.
Reflecting on what had gone wrong at the company, a further statement from Argeo said, when it went public in 2021, its objective was to acquire a minimum of five AUV systems for seabed mapping. The AUVs were to be mounted on chartered, rather than owned, vessels. “At that time,” the company said, “we believed five systems would provide the necessary flexibility to manage periods with limited work.”
However, as the company also explained, customers invariably requested offers based on the use of specific, known vessels, not vessels that happened to be available to be chartered at the time deals were awarded. This conflicted with Argeo’s business model of chartering vessels after contracts had been awarded. It therefore had to acquire a vessel and take another on a on long-term charter with an option to acquire it, in addition to acquiring an extra container-based survey system.
Another problem the company identified was that customers often asked for a broader product range than it could offer, which meant it had to invest again, this time in geotechnical equipment, and prepare to manage operations by remotely operated vehicles on Argeo Venture, the former Polarcus Nadia, a multipurpose vessel it had earlier acquired in 2023 from Shearwater. During summer 2024, a trio of AUV systems the company had in operation “generated a good operating result,” but after that, the market for its services deteriorated swiftly. In 2024, Argeo said, offshore wind and minerals projects represented nearly 50% of the work the company completed, but in 2025, the wind industry scaled back activity as that market deteriorated as the regulatory landscape changed, especially in the US.
In the Q1 presentation, Mr Grimnes said Q1 2025 was a busy quarter, and its commercial team was “very active,” pursuing new opportunities. “However, broader geopolitical and economic developments introduced increased uncertainty across our core markets,” Mr Grimes said, “and in the US, policy reversals paused green energy initiatives, stalling progress in the offshore wind segment. At the same time, global investor confidence in wind projects softened, leading to postponements. Similarly, progress in the marine minerals segment slowed as the UN formed a new body to regulate how resources should be used. This pushed project timelines back by at least a year. Meanwhile, the oil and gas market was experiencing reduced activity levels due to declining oil prices.”
Weakness in oil prices particularly affected demand for deepsea projects, which was one of Argeo’s most important markets. “As a result,” said Mr Grimnes, “the flow of projects fell significantly and already announced projects were postponed, some for extended periods.” In fact, despite pursuing several active tenders, significant uncertainty remained regarding future work, and at one stage, Argeo did not have work secured for its vessels or AUVs until a potential four-year contract in South America that would not have commenced until H2 2026.
As it sought much-needed additional work the company’s operating costs were becoming a strain on its resources. Argeo said it has daily operating costs of approximately Nkr1.5M, accounted for primarily by vessel operations, equipment costs and crew. To attempt to reduce costs, the board worked with investment banks and legal advisors to pursue solutions such as vessel sales, refinancing part of the group’s debt and equipment, and potential mergers. All these potential solutions required an equity injection to fund operations until new contracts materialised and to help establish a local presence for the contract in South America.
In the end, the company, together with its investment banks, failed to secure new capital or equity. “A significant amount of capital was required from professional investors beyond the existing shareholder base, and these efforts proved unsuccessful,” Argeo concluded. “The processes that were evaluated all required significant new equity as the group faced a summer period without confirmed projects. No realistic solutions could be implemented within the required timeframe, so the board deemed that filing for bankruptcy was the only viable option.”
Sign up for Riviera’s series of technical and operational webinars and conferences:
Events
© 2024 Riviera Maritime Media Ltd.